Infidels, Hermaphrodites, and Other Animals:
On the Boundaries of the Human in the Middle Ages
Leah De Vun, Rutgers University
Friday, February 1
7:30
CUNY Graduate Center, English Department Lounge
365 Fifth Avenue, Room 4406
This
paper examines hermaphroditism in light of questions about the nature
of humanity in the late Middle Ages/early Renaissance. In the late
Middle
Ages, scholastic natural philosophers – inspired by newly available
classical texts – began to construct taxonomies of organisms in which
sexual difference played a central role. Scholastics identified the
absence of distinct sex, shifting sex, and monstrous
genitalia as key characteristics of nonhuman categories of beings,
including plants, animals, and demons. The apparent boundaries between male/female and human/nonhuman intersected with other sorts
of boundaries: visual
art in bestiaries, maps, travel literature, and marginalia indicated
that Jews and Muslims too were in some sense hermaphrodites. Sexual
difference became a way to distinguish
between not
only humans and non-humans, but also Christians and non-Christians and
Europeans and non-Europeans. If humans were distinct from animals
inasmuch as they had only two sexes, then humans
who displayed multiple sexes or the attributes of multiple sexes
approached the condition of beasts and therefore lost the subjectivity
and dignity unique to humanity.
I argue that in texts and images
from the twelfth to the fifteenth century hermaphrodites operate as
pivotal figures that reinforced not only sexual, but also religious and
racial difference.
1 comment:
I have been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this web site. Thanks, I will try and check back more often. How frequently do you update your web site?
malibu wedding venue
Post a Comment